Tuesday, May 3, 2011

UK lags in children's well-being

SwedenSweden is the best country in the world for children's well-being, according to Save the Children

The UK is in the bottom half of an international league table of developed countries for "well-being" in childhood.

The rankings from Save the Children put Sweden in first place - with the UK in 23rd place out of 43 countries.

The report highlights the UK's relatively low rate of enrolment in education before school age.

A spokesman for England's education department, said Sure Start services would be "targeted at the poorest".

The report places Italy and Japan in joint second place, with the UK behind countries including France, Hungary, Slovenia and Estonia.

There are also rankings for developing countries - with the overall worst place for childhood identified as Somalia.

CHILDREN'S WELL-BEING TOP 10SwedenItalySpainGermanyAustriaFranceIcelandNorwaySwitzerlandLuxembourg

Source: Save the Children

The rankings for children's well-being are based on factors including enrolment in pre-school and secondary level education, and levels of infant mortality.

In terms of pre-primary education, the charity says the UK has a lower level of enrolment than many other developed countries - which it describes as a "national embarrassment".

"We can't be complacent about the state of early schooling for children in this country. If we are to catch up with our European neighbours, we have to take urgent steps to remedy this," said Save the Children's chief executive, Justin Forsyth.

"In particular, the government has to reverse the cuts to support for childcare it is imposing on poorest families," he said.

In response, a Department for Education spokesman said: "Tackling disadvantage and raising the life chances of the poorest children is critical to narrowing the gap and giving every child a fair start in life.

"We've increased the free entitlement to 15 hours per week of early years provision for all three and four-year-olds from last September - and are now extending it to all poor two-year-olds.

"We are also retaining Sure Start as a universal service for all - but want it much better targeted at the poorest families which need the most help."

The United States lags behind the UK in 34th place - with a considerably worse infant mortality rate than many countries in western and central Europe.

There are also tables showing the relative best and worst places to be a mother.

The highest ranked place in this Mothers' Index is Norway, followed by Australia and Iceland. The UK performs more strongly in this table, being ranked in 13th place.

Afghanistan is in the lowest place for the Mothers' Index. While a typical Norwegian mother might expect to live to 83 and to have 18 years of education, a typical mother in Afghanistan will live to 45 and spend less than five years in education.

The United States also does poorly in the Mothers' Index.

The report says that this reflects that the US has the worst rate in the developed world for the proportion of women dying in childbirth or from complications in pregnancy.

It says that a woman in the US is seven times more likely to die of a pregnancy-related illness than in Italy or Ireland.

Children in the US are also twice as likely to die before the age of five than children in countries such as Finland, Greece, Slovenia or Singapore.

The report also identifies the US as having the "least generous" maternity leave arrangements among wealthier countries.

Looking at the gap between the top-ranking western European countries and those at the bottom, such as in Afghanistan and countries in sub-Saharan Africa, the report says: "Statistics are far more than numbers.

"It is the human despair and lost opportunities behind these numbers that call for changes to ensure that mothers everywhere have the basic tools they need to break the cycle of poverty and improve the quality of life for themselves, their children, and for generations to come."

This article is from the BBC News website. � British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/education-13268306

world news more

Hospitals face tougher savings

Hospital staffHospitals in England face much tougher efficiency savings than previously thought
Related Stories

The regulator of NHS foundation trusts in England has warned hospitals must make even bigger efficiency savings than previously thought.

The Department of Health has already said it wants efficiency savings of 4% for each of the next five years.

But the regulator Monitor says it expects savings will be more in the order of 6% to 7%.

Monitor says higher than expected inflation and tougher financial penalties for hospitals are to blame.

As part of the government's reforms of the NHS in England every hospital is expected to become a foundation trust.

But to do that they must satisfy the financial regulator they can balance their books.

Around 85 hospitals and mental health trusts have yet to achieve foundation status, but now Monitor has told them the bar is being raised even higher.

In December the Department of Health said it was looking for efficiency savings of 4% for each of the next five years.

But in a letter to foundation trust applicants, Monitor says that higher than expected inflation, plus tough financial penalties for things like emergency re-admissions after surgery, mean savings will need to be between 6% and 7%.

In a statement the regulator said the changes to the economic climate mean all trusts will need to make savings.

"However, we should be clear that these assumptions are a reflection of the risks in the external environment; they are not a directive to make cuts.

“I can see a hospital doing this for one or two years, but not five years. It's like the unit cost of a hip operation, around £6,000, has got to decrease by 37%”

John Appleby Chief Economist, The King's Fund

"Trusts will need to take account of the individual circumstances that exist within their local health economy, which could mean that they will need to take either a more optimistic or pessimistic approach than the one set out by Monitor.

"It is essential that the quality of patient services does not suffer as a result cost-cutting measures."

In a statement the Department of Health said Monitor's assessment would be "challenging" for the NHS but pointed out that it was the "more pessimistic" of two scenarios set out by the regulator.

"The NHS is in a strong financial position. We are investing an extra £11.5 billion into the NHS by 2014-15.

"But higher costs and an ageing population mean that the NHS must meet the highest possible financial standards and find savings to reinvest into patient care.

"Monitor's assessment of 6% to 7% is its 'downside case', meaning it is more pessimistic. But it is right that Monitor's assessments are challenging - we want all hospitals to be able to meet Monitor's standards and show that they can provide sustainable, high quality and efficient services for their patients."

These figures matter not just because they show the financial pressures on the health system and in particular on hospitals.

They are also the benchmark which Monitor will use to judge whether a hospital will be granted foundation status.

And while some health economists had questioned whether hospitals could make year on year savings of 4%, these new figures look much tougher.

John Appleby, chief economist at the health think tank the King's Fund, said the savings are a big increase.

"I can see a hospital doing this for one or two years, but not five years.

"It's like the unit cost of a hip operation, around £6,000, has got to decrease by 37%. How?"

Hospitals in England have until April 2014 to achieve foundation trust status.

This article is from the BBC News website. � British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/health-13242722

resources info more news bbc news fox news

Waist fat 'increases heart risk'

Muffin-topThe researchers looked at the distance around the hips and waist to measure the fat around the belly
Related Stories

People with coronary artery disease have an increased risk of death if they have fat around the waist, according to researchers in the US.

The Mayo Clinic team, which analysed data from five studies involving 15,923 patients, found this even affected people with a normal Body Mass Index.

In the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, they said people with waist fat should try to lose weight.

The British Heart Foundation said those with heart disease should be vigilant.

The researchers at the Mayo Clinic looked at the distance around the hips and waist to measure the fat around the belly, and BMI which is a measure comparing height and weight.

There was a 75% increased risk of death for patients with high levels of fat around the waist compared with those with thin waists.

Even patients with a normal weight, a BMI between 20 and 25, had this increased risk of death if they were carrying fat around the waist.

Dr Thais Coutinho, from the Mayo Clinic, said: "BMI is just a measure of weight in proportion to height. What seems to be more important is how the fat is distributed on the body."

The researchers argue that doctors should take waist and hip measurements for all patients with coronary artery disease in order to give patients advice on how to reduce their risk.

Dr Mike Knapton, associate medical director at the British Heart Foundation, said: "This study shows that abdominal obesity is the major risk factor for patients with coronary heart disease even if they have a normal BMI and are a healthy weight.

"The study only looked at patients with coronary heart disease, but it confirms the idea that abdominal fat is 'toxic' and is associated with a number of other risk factors for the disease such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol and diabetes.

"It can be confusing to hear that raised BMI is bad for you and then to hear that waist circumference is the important measure, rather than BMI. I would advise that your BMI should generally be between 20 and 25 and if you have heart disease you need to be extra vigilant if you are carrying excess weight on your waist."

This article is from the BBC News website. � British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/health-13222192

bbc news fox news national news state news financial news

Monday, May 2, 2011

US tobacco firms defeat hospitals

Generic photo of a cigarette being smokedHospitals had alleged that firms misrepresented the health effects of smoking
Related Stories

Six major US tobacco companies have defeated a lawsuit by hospitals seeking compensation for treating patients with smoking-related illnesses.

Thirty-seven hospitals in the state of Missouri had claimed cigarette companies delivered an "unreasonably dangerous" product.

They sought more than $455m (£272m) reimbursement for treating uninsured smokers who had not paid for care.

The hospitals treat many destitute, non-paying patients.

They said medical ethics required them to treat people in need, regardless of their ability to pay.

In the case, the hospitals claimed that tobacco companies manipulated the nicotine content in cigarettes and misrepresented the health effects of smoking.

But a jury in St Louis rejected their claim.

"The jury agreed with Philip Morris USA that ordinary cigarettes are not negligently designed or defective," said Murray Garnick of Philip Morris.

An official from Lorillard, another company in the case, said: "Compelling evidence was presented to the jury, including testimony from hospital witnesses, that confirmed the hospitals were not financially damaged as they asserted."

This article is from the BBC News website. � British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/world-us-canada-13246990

now this resources info more news bbc news

Ageing assets

 
Happy elderly manMany elderly people are happy and healthy

The increasing number of elderly people in society tends to be seen as a problem.

But in this week's Scrubbing Up column, old age psychiatrist Dr Julian Hughes argues we should actually see the over-60s as a bonus.

The prospect of getting old has never seemed alluring. And even if this is changing with the important advocacy of people like Dame Joan Bakewell, the ageing population is still seen as a problem.

The problem of ageing for the individual appears as anything from wrinkles to memory problems; whilst the problem for ageing societies is seen as economic.

Increasingly, however, evidence is emerging that ageing is less of a problem than people, often younger, think it might be.

For a start, even if age does bring aches, it also seems - according to studies all over the world - to bring happiness.

A large study by Newcastle University, for instance, has shown that 85-year-olds, despite having significant levels of disease and impairment, are very positive about their health and are able to function well.

Even at the level of the economy, pointing the finger at older people turns out to be unfair.

The rest of society has to spend money on its older people, for sure, but the traffic is two-way, especially if (what are called) intergenerational transfers are measured broadly.

Putting it bluntly, older people are giving more to their offspring by and large than the other way around.

If we look at volunteering, we discover that the big society is already here, and has been for years. But it is largely dominated by older people.

From the Women's Royal Voluntary Service, working in our hospitals and communities, to the volunteers working at National Trust properties or the voluntary work of faith-based charities, volunteers are more likely to be naturally silver.

This is active citizenship, but also active ageing.

“Who wishes to live a life that is brutal and short? ”

Dr Julian Hughes

Remaining active, of course, is good for you, both mentally and physically.

But, some will say, albeit we can paint an optimistic picture, isn't it the case that the diseases of old age will catch up with us eventually? Well, they might.

It is certainly true that living longer brings with it an increasing risk of age-associated conditions, from arthritis to stroke disease. However, we have to remember that longevity is a success.

Who wishes to live a life that is brutal and short? And if most people at 85 are enjoying their lives, why would we wish not to enjoy this possibility too?

After all, one aspiration of gerontology, the science of ageing, is that the morbidity curve can be squared off.

In other words, rather than the ends of our lives involving an inevitably slow decline, instead, after a relatively healthy old age, we'll die quickly.

Indeed, given the link between so many diseases and ageing, it makes sense to argue (somewhat radically) that if we could understand ageing itself (as we are increasingly doing), we might then have a better chance with cancer, heart disease, dementia, and so on.

The real challenge, however, is to do with making sense of our lives. If we're going to live longer, which we are, what's it for? Biomedical science and technology will help us to age.

The purpose of ageing, however, what gives life meaning, is a matter for the arts, social sciences and humanities.

This article is from the BBC News website. � British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/health-13093992

resources info more news bbc news fox news

VIDEO: UN: Osama death 'watershed moment'

UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon has said that the death of Osama Bin Laden is a "watershed moment".

This article is from the BBC News website. � British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/world-us-canada-13260609

state news financial news Europe news read more news

Prosecutor: Blago 'Sold Out The Trust' Of People

Enlarge Associated Press

Former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, arrives at federal court for final jury selection and opening arguments in his second corruption trial, Monday, May 2, 2011, in Chicago. Blagojevich, who was convicted of one count of lying to the FBI in his original trial, faces 20 federal counts at his second trial, including allegations that he tried to sell or trade President Barack Obama's former Senate seat.



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Plugin | Hud Settlement Statement

Source: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=135489613&ft=1&f=

bbc news fox news national news state news financial news

Jono's dilemma

 
Laura and Jono

Jono and Laura's genetic dilemma

For Jono Lancaster, who has Treacher Collins syndrome, the decision about whether to have a baby or not is agonising.

At the age of 26, Jono is happy with how he looks, but the genetic disorder that affected the way his facial bones developed in the womb has caused him years of anguish.

His condition means he has no cheekbones - so his eyes droop downwards - and he has problems with his hearing, so has a bone-anchored hearing aid.

It has resulted in years of bullying, several operations and numerous hospital visits. It also led his parents to give him up for adoption 36 hours after he was born.

But perhaps the most vital factor for Jono and his long-term girlfriend, 20-year-old Laura Richardson, is that it is also hereditary, so any child Jono fathers naturally has a 50% chance of having Treacher Collins.

Find out moreSo What If My Baby Is Born Like Me? will be broadcast on BBC Three at 2100 BST on Tuesday 19 April 2011Or watch it later on iPlayer 'I hated my face in the mirror'

Jono says until he met Laura, he always assumed he would adopt.

"It worked really well for me, and giving a child a second chance, I think that's brilliant.

"But Laura thinks she will have those instincts of really wanting to carry a child, and she's worried that she might find it hard to look after someone else's child - or that the child will just want to find its natural parents.

"Plus she really wants our child to be 'our' child. And I really want to look after her when she is pregnant, for her to be on the sofa, or for me to run downstairs at 2am when she fancies a pickle."

“The big debate in my head is how can I knowingly put my own child through potential suffering”

He says ruling out children is not an option.

"I've always dreamed of being a daddy. I crave father and son moments - my adoptive mum was absolutely amazing but I never had a father figure in my life, and that's something I really, really want. I want to do the school run, take my child to dance, gymnastics or football - whatever they want."

But for the couple - and particularly Jono - the thought of having a child naturally opens a minefield of morals, emotions and self-questioning.

"Knowing that there's a good chance of passing your condition on to your child. It scares me and I question whether it's the right thing to do.

"The big debate in my head is how can I knowingly put my own child through potential suffering," he says.

To add to their predicament, Treacher Collins syndrome - which is thought to affect up to one in 10,000 people in the UK - varies in severity, but there is no way of predicting how severely a child will be affected.

Jono Lancaster and Laura RichardsonJono and Laura have been together for four years

While some sufferers have problems with hearing and facial features, others can be born unable to breathe.

"I've met a girl that needed a tracheotomy and 24-hour care, and another boy had to have his jaw extracted - which means putting a brace on every morning and and twisting it, which breaks the jaw - how can I knowingly put a child through that? I'd feel so guilty."

But Jono says if they decide to have a child naturally, "abortion is not an option" for him.

"I want to make the right decision. Right from the very start. So if I decide to have a child naturally, we go through the whole thing. Not just give up on it halfway through."

Because doctors have been able to locate Jono's abnormal gene, the final option that Jono and Laura are considering is IVF with pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).

What is Treacher Collins syndrome?A genetic disorder also known as Treacher Collins-Franceschetti syndrome or mandibulofacial dysostosisFacial bones do not develop as they should in the womb and babies are born with characteristic facial featuresSufferers often have problems with hearing, breathing and eatingMost children pass developmental milestones, such as starting to walk and talk, at the usual time and are of normal intelligenceMany need specialised hearing aids or speech therapyAbout one in every 10,000 babies in the UK is born with Treacher Collins syndrome

Source: BBC Health

Treacher Collins syndrome

The procedure is controversial - both ethically and from a religious point of view - because it involves testing embryos for genetic disorders before implanting an unaffected one in the womb.

Some disabled groups also argue it harms their chances of equality and understanding. Ian Macrae, editor of the magazine and website Disability Now, says he would never condemn an individual for making their own choice, but he had significant concerns about screening embryos.

"It re-enforces the stereotypical notion that disability per se is a bad thing that should be excluded and that disabled lives are intrinsically less valuable.

"Also, if you make the comparison with ethnicity, which I know is not always helpful, and you want to start doing this to people of colour, then there would be, quite rightly, an outcry. For me, disabled people are part of the rich mix of a diverse society."

We want to be working towards a society that can accommodate the range of needs that people have, rather than getting rid of the people, he says.

Macrae himself has a congenital cataracts condition that could have been passed to his children but he says he would not have agreed to screening, had screening been available.

For Jono, it is the moral issue that is particularly poignant.

"When I first heard of IVF PGD I had this kind of moral dilemma going on in my head, that if my parents had chosen to do it, I wouldn't be here today.

The wider issues

There are two main issues. The first is whether it's right to destroy an embryo or foetus with a condition that isn't life threatening to have another child, or whether it is permissible to destroy human life in order to have children.

Since we allow 100,000 abortions every year in the UK I don't think we place a very high value on human life, so I don't think we can have strong objections, and there shouldn't be laws to prevent people from doing so.

The second issue is what kind of society do we want to live in?

By making these sorts of choices are we discriminating about people and expressing negative attitudes because we are saying this condition isn't worthy of life?

Julian Savulescu, professor of practical ethics at the University of Oxford

"Then there are all these other amazing people in the world with genetic disorders, I think the world is a better place because they are in it. I'd feel in some way like I'm insulting or disrespecting them, and that's what I'm struggling with."

He also feels guilty that Laura would bear the brunt of the procedure.

"She'd have to inject the hormones, have the eggs taken out - it puts her under so much pressure and that frustrates the life out of me because this is my condition."

Although Jono thinks having a child through IVF PGD is probably best option for their child, he says he is still goes through an "emotional rollercoaster" when he thinks about actually having to make a decision.

"I could argue with myself all day - there's an answer and an argument for everything."

Dr Christine Patch, a genetic counsellor at Guy's and St Thomas' hospital, says it is important for couples like Jono and Laura to understand the facts, talk through choices and make the decision that is right for them - taking into account their culture and personal beliefs.

"It's very hard for people with the condition themselves - they are the ones that know much better than anyone else how it is to live with it.

Jono LancasterJono thinks there is an argument for and against every option

"Many will be conflicted, they may quite rightly see themselves as being able to fulfil a normal valuable role in society, so thinking about not having a child the same as them is difficult for them emotionally and psychologically."

Jono agrees that understanding his options has been a huge step forward and will allow him to move on.

"Starting a family should be a romantic and exciting time - and hopefully by the time we are ready to have children, we'll be able to make our dream a reality."

This article is from the BBC News website. � British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/magazine-12987504

now this resources info more news bbc news

UK gas field may close in tax row

Morecambe field gas platformMorecambe Bay provides about 6% of the UK's annual gas needs
Related Stories

Centrica, the owner of British Gas, says it might shut one of its major gas fields because of increased taxes.

The company is closing three fields in Morecambe Bay for a month of maintenance, and says it might not reopen one of them.

In his Budget, Chancellor George Osborne raised supplementary tax on oil and gas production from 20% to 32%.

Centrica says UK producers now face some of the highest taxes in the world.

The company has closed the Morecambe Bay North and Rivers gas fields for about four weeks' planned maintenance.

It is also shutting the South Morecambe field for an unspecified period of work, and the firm says it might not be restarted.

"UK oil and gas producing fields are now subject to some of the highest levels of tax in the world," a spokesman said.

"At these higher tax rates, Morecambe's profitability can be marginal ... Accordingly, we may choose to buy gas for our customers in the wholesale markets in preference to restarting the field after planned maintenance."

“Companies are reflecting real concern... they just don't need this grief”

Mike Tholen Oil and Gas UK

Morecambe Bay produces about 6% of the UK's annual gas requirements, or up to 12% of residential gas demand, according to Centrica.

The company says the tax increase means its North Morecambe field is now subject to a 62% tax rate and South Morecambe 81%.

The Chancellor's move, in his Budget in March, was designed to raise £2bn to fund a cut in fuel duty.

Industry bosses have criticised the new tax, describing it as short-sighted.

Mike Tholen from the industry body, Oil and Gas UK, says energy companies are working in a competitive industry and they are unhappy about three tax increases in the past decade.

He says: "I think companies are actually reflecting real concern for their shareholders because they are trying to manage long term businesses -- of which the UK is part of a much bigger portfolio for many companies -- and they just don't need this grief."

Industry leaders met the Chancellor to discuss the tax rise last month, and said they were "disappointed" that he disagreed with them over the impact of the tax.

This article is from the BBC News website. � British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/uk-13256597

resources info more news bbc news fox news

VIDEO: Berlin suffers wild boar invasion

People in Berlin are growing used to the sight of wild boar in the streets, as increasing numbers of them come into the city to look for food.

This article is from the BBC News website. � British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/world-europe-13251805

world news more now this resources info